Rover

A redesign the booking process

Rover

A redesign the booking process

Rover

A redesign the booking process

Rover

A redesign the booking process

Rover is a an app connecting pet owners with trusted local sitters… with some room for improvement.

Rover is a an app connecting pet owners with trusted local sitters… with some room for improvement.

Rover is a an app connecting pet owners with trusted local sitters… with some room for improvement.

Rover is a an app connecting pet owners with trusted local sitters… with some room for improvement.

00

role

UX/UI Designer Researcher

category

UI/UX Design

year

2023

timeframe

4 weeks

00

role

UX/UI Designer Researcher

category

UI/UX Design

year

2023

timeframe

4 weeks

00

role

UX/UI Designer Researcher

category

UI/UX Design

year

2023

timeframe

4 weeks

00

role

UX/UI Designer Researcher

category

UI/UX Design

year

2023

timeframe

4 weeks

Background

Rover is an app that connects pet owners with local Pet Sitters and Walkers. Operating in 10 countries they have a large community of Pet Sitters who will, board, walk, house sit. or just drop by to check in on people’s pets.

PS - This is a case study, I am no way affiliated with Rover. 

Problem

Rover's current booking process requires Pet Owners to cold message Sitters and is a time intensive process. Research showed a lot of Sitters respond that they are unavailable or completely ghost the Pet Owners. (Read more how I got this understanding below). By overhauling the existing process, Rover can provide a more fluid process for both Pet Owners and Sitters.

tools

• Figma

• FigJam

• Handsketch

• After Effects

deliverables

• User Interviews

• New & Existing Site Maps

• Information Architecture

• Hi-Fi Wireframes

01

Research

Competitive Analysis

Wag!

Rover’s most direct competitor. The UI adds personality and helpful icons. They only have 2 options when viewing sitters, leaving little control in the client's hands.

TrustedHouseSitters

Combines pet and house sitting into a single service. When both client and sitters travel, sitters get a place to stay and clients get someone to take care of their pets.

care

This app tried to cover the gamut, child & pet & home & senior care. The UI is pleasant and intuitive. Not specializing in pets the resulted in a lack of specific services.

Fetch!

This app was a struggle, the UI all a series of accordion menus. The lack of icons and services made it incredibly difficult to figure out.

Secondary Research

Insights derived from Rover's app reviews on Trustpilot and Apple's App Store proved to be a vital guide to identify prevalent hurdles users encounter. Parsing through all this information, a pattern or pain points started to emerge.

What made booking a Sitter so difficult?

Tackling this challenge demanded a thorough approach. Discussions with 3 pet owners and 2 sitters revealed their collective frustrations with finding a pet sitters. Emily struggled with the anxiety of leaving her dog during vacations, while Zoe resorted to a 'spray and pray' method for finding sitters. Becca abandoned Rover altogether due to her negative experiences with a sitter who ghosted her, even after meeting her and her pup. Through empathy mapping, key insights were distilled, unveiling recurring themes:

For most pet sitters, this is their side gig. So… how many hours will my dog be alone each day?

Emily Sonoma, California

I usually message a few sitters. Sometimes they don't respond at all.

Zoe Austin, Texas

Some sitters are flakey. Even after meeting us they never got back to me about watching my dog.

Becca Las Vegas, Nevada

Key insights:

Pet Owners sit request requires high effort out of the gate, and if they get little or zero replies it creates frustration.

Sitters felt no responsibility to get back to the Pet Owner's inquiries.

The primary pain point was the booking process.

How Might We?

How might we make the messages more intuitive & less redundant?

How might we avoid clients having to verify availability of sitters?

How might we allow a client to get a better sense and qualifications of a sitter without having to message them first?

01

Research

Competitive Analysis

Wag!

Rover’s most direct competitor. The UI adds personality and helpful icons. They only have 2 options when viewing sitters, leaving little control in the client's hands.

TrustedHouseSitters

Combines pet and house sitting into a single service. When both client and sitters travel, sitters get a place to stay and clients get someone to take care of their pets.

care

This app tried to cover the gamut, child & pet & home & senior care. The UI is pleasant and intuitive. Not specializing in pets the resulted in a lack of specific services.

Fetch!

This app was a struggle, the UI all a series of accordion menus. The lack of icons and services made it incredibly difficult to figure out.

Secondary Research

Insights derived from Rover's app reviews on Trustpilot and Apple's App Store proved to be a vital guide to identify prevalent hurdles users encounter. Parsing through all this information, a pattern or pain points started to emerge.

What made booking a Sitter so difficult?

Tackling this challenge demanded a thorough approach. Discussions with 3 pet owners and 2 sitters revealed their collective frustrations with finding a pet sitters. Emily struggled with the anxiety of leaving her dog during vacations, while Zoe resorted to a 'spray and pray' method for finding sitters. Becca abandoned Rover altogether due to her negative experiences with a sitter who ghosted her, even after meeting her and her pup. Through empathy mapping, key insights were distilled, unveiling recurring themes:

For most pet sitters, this is their side gig. So… how many hours will my dog be alone each day?

Emily Sonoma, California

I usually message a few sitters. Sometimes they don't respond at all.

Zoe Austin, Texas

Some sitters are flakey. Even after meeting us they never got back to me about watching my dog.

Becca Las Vegas, Nevada

Key insights:

Pet Owners sit request requires high effort out of the gate, and if they get little or zero replies it creates frustration.

Sitters felt no responsibility to get back to the Pet Owner's inquiries.

The primary pain point was the booking process.

How Might We?

…make messages more intuitive & less redundant?

…avoid clients having to verify availability of sitters?

…allow a client to get a better sense and qualifications of a sitter without having to message them first?

01

Research

Competitive Analysis

Wag!

Rover’s most direct competitor. The UI adds personality and helpful icons. They only have 2 options when viewing sitters, leaving little control in the client's hands.

TrustedHouseSitters

Combines pet and house sitting into a single service. When both client and sitters travel, sitters get a place to stay and clients get someone to take care of their pets.

care

This app tried to cover the gamut, child & pet & home & senior care. The UI is pleasant and intuitive. Not specializing in pets the resulted in a lack of specific services.

Fetch!

This app was a struggle, the UI all a series of accordion menus. The lack of icons and services made it incredibly difficult to figure out.

Secondary Research

Insights derived from Rover's app reviews on Trustpilot and Apple's App Store proved to be a vital guide to identify prevalent hurdles users encounter. Parsing through all this information, a pattern or pain points started to emerge.

What made booking a Sitter so difficult?

Tackling this challenge demanded a thorough approach. Discussions with 3 pet owners and 2 sitters revealed their collective frustrations with finding a pet sitters. Emily struggled with the anxiety of leaving her dog during vacations, while Zoe resorted to a 'spray and pray' method for finding sitters. Becca abandoned Rover altogether due to her negative experiences with a sitter who ghosted her, even after meeting her and her pup. Through empathy mapping, key insights were distilled, unveiling recurring themes:

For most pet sitters, this is their side gig. So… how many hours will my dog be alone each day?

Emily Sonoma, California

I usually message a few sitters. Sometimes they don't respond at all.

Zoe Austin, Texas

Some sitters are flakey. Even after meeting us they never got back to me about watching my dog.

Becca Las Vegas, Nevada

Key insights:

Pet Owners sit request requires high effort out of the gate, and if they get little or zero replies it creates frustration.

Sitters felt no responsibility to get back to the Pet Owner's inquiries.

The primary pain point was the booking process.

How Might We?

How might we make the messages more intuitive & less redundant?

How might we avoid clients having to verify availability of sitters?

How might we allow a client to get a better sense and qualifications of a sitter without having to message them first?

01

Research

Competitive Analysis

Wag!

Rover’s most direct competitor. The UI adds personality and helpful icons. They only have 2 options when viewing sitters, leaving little control in the client's hands.

TrustedHouseSitters

Combines pet and house sitting into a single service. When both client and sitters travel, sitters get a place to stay and clients get someone to take care of their pets.

care

This app tried to cover the gamut, child & pet & home & senior care. The UI is pleasant and intuitive. Not specializing in pets the resulted in a lack of specific services.

Fetch!

This app was a struggle, the UI all a series of accordion menus. The lack of icons and services made it incredibly difficult to figure out.

Secondary Research

Insights derived from Rover's app reviews on Trustpilot and Apple's App Store proved to be a vital guide to identify prevalent hurdles users encounter. Parsing through all this information, a pattern or pain points started to emerge.

What made booking a Sitter so difficult?

Tackling this challenge demanded a thorough approach. Discussions with 3 pet owners and 2 sitters revealed their collective frustrations with finding a pet sitters. Emily struggled with the anxiety of leaving her dog during vacations, while Zoe resorted to a 'spray and pray' method for finding sitters. Becca abandoned Rover altogether due to her negative experiences with a sitter who ghosted her, even after meeting her and her pup. Through empathy mapping, key insights were distilled, unveiling recurring themes:

For most pet sitters, this is their side gig. So… how many hours will my dog be alone each day?

Emily Sonoma, California

I usually message a few sitters. Sometimes they don't respond at all.

Zoe Austin, Texas

Some sitters are flakey. Even after meeting us they never got back to me about watching my dog.

Becca Las Vegas, Nevada

Key insights:

Pet Owners sit request requires high effort out of the gate, and if they get little or zero replies it creates frustration.

Sitters felt no responsibility to get back to the Pet Owner's inquiries.

The primary pain point was the booking process.

How Might We?

How might we make the messages more intuitive & less redundant?

How might we avoid clients having to verify availability of sitters?

How might we allow a client to get a better sense and qualifications of a sitter without having to message them first?

02

Information Architecture

Site Map

Research showed most Sitters also used Rover to book other Sitters when they were out of town. The app's current design has two Home pages, one for Sitters and the other for Pet Owners, leaving the user feeling adrift. Moving the Booking menu to a binary CTA on the Home tab and combining it with the Sitting schedule creates a harmonious flow.

Rover's current Inbox tab has 4… yes, 4 inboxes. Combined with reliance on unclear icons makes for a puzzling experience. By simply using an Current and Past makes a more intuitive Inbox.

Task Flow

Changing the approach of booking a pet sitter from a call/respond format to a "Job Posting" ends the back and forth necessary with Rover's current set up. If a pet sitter is interested is the job they simply confirm availability with a single click. Then the client (pet owner) is presented with a list of sitters who have confirmed they are available and interested in the job.

02

Information Architecture

Site Map

Research showed most Sitters also used Rover to book other Sitters when they were out of town. The app's current design has two Home pages, one for Sitters and the other for Pet Owners, leaving the user feeling adrift. Moving the Booking menu to a binary CTA on the Home tab and combining it with the Sitting schedule creates a harmonious flow.

Rover's current Inbox tab has 4… yes, 4 inboxes. Combined with reliance on unclear icons makes for a puzzling experience. By simply using an Current and Past makes a more intuitive Inbox.

Task Flow

Changing the approach of booking a pet sitter from a call/respond format to a "Job Posting" ends the back and forth necessary with Rover's current set up. If a pet sitter is interested is the job they simply confirm availability with a single click. Then the client (pet owner) is presented with a list of sitters who have confirmed they are available and interested in the job.

02

Information Architecture

Site Map

Research showed most Sitters also used Rover to book other Sitters when they were out of town. The app's current design has two Home pages, one for Sitters and the other for Pet Owners, leaving the user feeling adrift. Moving the Booking menu to a binary CTA on the Home tab and combining it with the Sitting schedule creates a harmonious flow.

Rover's current Inbox tab has 4… yes, 4 inboxes. Combined with reliance on unclear icons makes for a puzzling experience. By simply using an Current and Past makes a more intuitive Inbox.

Task Flow

Changing the approach of booking a pet sitter from a call/respond format to a "Job Posting" ends the back and forth necessary with Rover's current set up. If a pet sitter is interested is the job they simply confirm availability with a single click. Then the client (pet owner) is presented with a list of sitters who have confirmed they are available and interested in the job.

02

Information Architecture

Site Map

Research showed most Sitters also used Rover to book other Sitters when they were out of town. The app's current design has two Home pages, one for Sitters and the other for Pet Owners, leaving the user feeling adrift. Moving the Booking menu to a binary CTA on the Home tab and combining it with the Sitting schedule creates a harmonious flow.

Rover's current Inbox tab has 4… yes, 4 inboxes. Combined with reliance on unclear icons makes for a puzzling experience. By simply using an Current and Past makes a more intuitive Inbox.

Task Flow

Changing the approach of booking a pet sitter from a call/respond format to a "Job Posting" ends the back and forth necessary with Rover's current set up. If a pet sitter is interested is the job they simply confirm availability with a single click. Then the client (pet owner) is presented with a list of sitters who have confirmed they are available and interested in the job.

03

Design

Wireframes

The following wireframes show the development of the booking process from the Client's perspective of creating a Job Card, and contact with the Pet Sitter. It also shows screens of the Pet Sitter receiving a notification and reviewing the Job.

Sketch Wireframes

Sketch Wireframes

Sketch Wireframes

Sketch Wireframes

Client creates a Job Card for a Home Sit

Pet Carer receives alert and
examines the Job Card

Pet Carer receives alert and examines the Job Card

The Client reviews the list Sitters who accepted the Job then messages one they like

The Client reviews the list Sitters who accepted the Job then messages one they like

04

Design Iteration

Usability Insight

5 participants
Ages 27- 50
3 tasks - create a Job Card as a Pet Owner, review Job Card as a Sitter, then message Sitter

Testing revealed a few insights for the of the design. Users found the process easy to use and needed a few minor changes to make the instructions a little clearer.

Improving the Home screen

Depending if the user a pet sitter or pet owner, Rover's current design has two Home pages. Research showed that most pet sitters also use Rover to as a client, and vise versa. Instead of having two Home screens the user is given a CTA.

Adding a simple carousel of relevant topics creates a sense of community.

Original

Original Home Screens

Pet Owner

Pet Owner

Pet Sitter

Pet Sitter

New

New Home Screen

A single CTA (call to action) button instead of two Home screens

A single CTA (call to action) button instead of two Home screens

Image carousel featuring relevant pet topics for the Rover community

Image carousel featuring relevant pet topics for the Rover community

Placing a list of Sitters allows pet owners to browse & search for Sitters at a high level

Placing a list of Sitters allows pet owners to browse & search for Sitters at a high level

Improving the Sitter's Experience

Rover's current systems pings Pet Sitters with an auto-populated message sent by the client with details about the job. Unfortunately this message is disorganized and does not display the information clearly. A lot of the information is repeated in different areas, with no consistency between them.

The way in which information is presented can make all the difference. Using a Job Card format with the essential details laid out in a clear visual cues using the 4 of the 5Ws (who, what, where, and when) generating an effective hierarchy.

Original

Event date is repeated four times, creating redundant information

Event date is repeated four times, creating redundant information

The total dollar amount the sitter earns from this job is not clear

The total dollar amount the sitter earns from this job is not clear

Accepting or declining a Sitting involves composing a message. Most Sitters end up not replying to inquiries due to this

Accepting or declining a Sitting involves composing a message. Most Sitters end up not replying to inquiries due to this

New

Notification

Notification

Job Card

Job Card

Job Card

05

Prototype

Take a look at the Figma prototype in action!

Looking back

Lessons

The time spent scouring through reviews for secondary research was well spent. These findings were critical in pinpointing the right problem to solve for the largest user gain.

Also, without the aid of those close to me who participated in testing, research, (and encouragement) I wouldn't have been able to make this project happen, I am forever in their debt.

Next Steps

I would like to pass these findings and solutions off to the team at Rover and hopefully they can implement some of my findings into their app.